Batch link parser
Paste a messy list of links — chat exports, notes, a column from a sheet. The parser pulls out every Suno reference, works out what each one points at, drops the repeats and hands you a clean table.
Nothing is fetched. Parsing happens entirely in this tab — only the text you paste is read.
| # | Type | ID | Link | Status |
|---|
How it works
Every URL in the pasted text is matched, then classified by its shape: a song path, a playlist path, a creator handle, or something the parser does not recognise. Each row keeps the identifier it found — a UUID for songs and playlists, a handle for profiles — so the same song pasted twice with different tracking parameters collapses into one row instead of two.
- Deduplication is by type plus identifier, not by raw string, so ?sh= share suffixes do not create phantom entries.
- Status is a parse result, not a network result: ready means the link is well formed and usable in the other tools, unrecognised means it did not look like a Suno reference.
- CSV suits a spreadsheet triage pass; JSON keeps the counts and the duplicate tally alongside the items for scripts.
Tips
- Paste straight from a chat log — surrounding words, commas and brackets are stripped automatically.
- Run the list here first, then feed the cleaned song links to the song downloader or the song inspector.
- Unrecognised rows are kept rather than hidden, so you can see what was thrown away instead of guessing.
Common questions
How many links can I paste at once?
There is no hard cap. Parsing is a single pass over the text, so a few thousand lines still returns instantly; the table is the only thing that gets long.
Does this download anything?
No. This tool only reads and classifies text. Downloading happens in the dedicated song, playlist and profile tools.
Why does a link show as unrecognised?
Because its path did not match a song, playlist or profile pattern. Shortened redirect links are a common cause — open them once so they resolve to a full address, then paste that.
Is the order preserved?
Yes. Rows appear in the order the links were first seen, and later duplicates are counted rather than reordered.